Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
+24
AnneNeville
Georgette888
Ireth
opals
bayth
tanita_mors
valkeakuulas
Divalicious
sjonnepon
Ranwing
Lottie2303
Kurt addict
JamieRulz
mindschemez
fantastica
coxfire
Glorfindel
sheny
ChrisColferFan1
ColferInspired
Buenos
Jellyrolls
brisallie
Porcelain
28 posters
Page 1 of 40
Page 1 of 40 • 1, 2, 3 ... 20 ... 40
Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
I won't lie, I'll miss Alex and Becca. Melissa... not so much.
Porcelain- Baby Penguin
- Posts : 64
Join date : 2014-01-15
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Sue is moving to NYC? What is she gonna do there?! Teaching at Nyada or work in a gym?
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Gosh, the McKinley folks sure are sending out a lot of spoiler tweets.
So, are they trying to recreate the original ND running around NY? Yeah. That's going to make us love them and wish you weren't kicking them off the show.
So, are they trying to recreate the original ND running around NY? Yeah. That's going to make us love them and wish you weren't kicking them off the show.
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
The poor Noobs and Jenna are probably "partying" between takes and every evening...just saying..
That Sue will be incorporated to New York just says it all for Glee "realism".
That Sue will be incorporated to New York just says it all for Glee "realism".
Last edited by Buenos on 1/16/2014, 10:51 pm; edited 1 time in total
Buenos- Inner Grandma
- Posts : 6331
Join date : 2012-04-20
Location : California
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Much better.
ColferInspired- Inner Grandma
- Posts : 8798
Join date : 2012-02-20
Location : Australia
Real Name : Liz
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
ColferInspired wrote:
Much better.
Agree 100%.
ChrisColferFan1- Bruce
- Posts : 2848
Join date : 2012-04-24
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Sigh...what New York should have look like this year...
Buenos- Inner Grandma
- Posts : 6331
Join date : 2012-04-20
Location : California
Buenos- Inner Grandma
- Posts : 6331
Join date : 2012-04-20
Location : California
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
^Dear Lord, how 'funny'.
1) Brittany is not a toddler who needs a grown-up to tell her what she's doing wrong. She's not Elmo: not as endearing and not as innocent.
2) Just because she's supposed to be dumb, or a genius (who knows at this point), doesn't mean that Brittanny can abuse other people at will, like using them as chess pieces.
Oh well, maybe I'm reading that scene wrong and it just rubs me the wrong way, but one way or another they'll scew it up, I'm sure.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh joy, just what I was hoping for.
1) Brittany is not a toddler who needs a grown-up to tell her what she's doing wrong. She's not Elmo: not as endearing and not as innocent.
2) Just because she's supposed to be dumb, or a genius (who knows at this point), doesn't mean that Brittanny can abuse other people at will, like using them as chess pieces.
Oh well, maybe I'm reading that scene wrong and it just rubs me the wrong way, but one way or another they'll scew it up, I'm sure.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh joy, just what I was hoping for.
Glorfindel- Inner Grandma
- Posts : 8707
Join date : 2012-02-19
Location : the Netherlands
Real Name : Marie
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Glorfindel wrote:^Dear Lord, how 'funny'.
1) Brittany is not a toddler who needs a grown-up to tell her what she's doing wrong. She's not Elmo: not as endearing and not as innocent.
2) Just because she's supposed to be dumb, or a genius (who knows at this point), doesn't mean that Brittanny can abuse other people at will, like using them as chess pieces.
Oh well, maybe I'm reading that scene wrong and it just rubs me the wrong way, but one way or another they'll scew it up, I'm sure.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh joy, just what I was hoping for.
Brittany should never have evolved from what she was in the beginning: a girl that had her own vision of the world, a little off-the-world, but mostly a background supporting character.
The importance her character was granted was far too much considering both the limited acting abilities of HeMo (and let's not talk about the numbers of songs she had with suh an average voice), but also the limitations of what the character had to offer. When you add it up with the tendency Glee has to condone ome of its characters actions (Becky/Blaine/Stalker Rachel...), I couldn't stand her last year. Having her back does nothing for me, it was more a good riddance.
As for the Klaine scene, considering 501, it is inevitable, Klaine will be featured, as much as it makes us here want to puke.
coxfire- Porcelain
- Posts : 641
Join date : 2012-09-18
Real Name : Mel
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
I love Jane Lynch's acting, and when Sue's acting like a human being I can stand her, but I don't want Sue in New York.
There's unrealistic in general terms, and there's unrealistic in Glee terms, but Sue in New York and interacting with the old Glee club members takes 'unrealistic' to a whole other level imo.
Not to mention how they without blinking sacrificed (and still do) the old cast and their golden dynamic in the name of staying 'realistic'.
There's unrealistic in general terms, and there's unrealistic in Glee terms, but Sue in New York and interacting with the old Glee club members takes 'unrealistic' to a whole other level imo.
Not to mention how they without blinking sacrificed (and still do) the old cast and their golden dynamic in the name of staying 'realistic'.
Glorfindel- Inner Grandma
- Posts : 8707
Join date : 2012-02-19
Location : the Netherlands
Real Name : Marie
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
coxfire wrote:As for the Klaine scene, considering 501, it is inevitable, Klaine will be featured, as much as it makes us here want to puke.Glorfindel wrote:
Oh joy, just what I was hoping for.
I don't have a problem with the Klaine scene, if it means more Chris Colfer on my screen. They interacted in only two episodes this season, so giving them a third one after 6 episodes of nothing is not that bad.
sheny- Bruce
- Posts : 2881
Join date : 2012-05-09
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
sheny wrote:
I don't have a problem with the Klaine scene, if it means more Chris Colfer on my screen. They interacted in only two episodes this season, so giving them a third one after 6 episodes of nothing is not that bad.
Oh, the "K" part of Klaine don't bother me, on the contrary, but having to refrain from punching my laptop each time the "laine" one appears on is tiresome.
coxfire- Porcelain
- Posts : 641
Join date : 2012-09-18
Real Name : Mel
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Glorfindel wrote:^Dear Lord, how 'funny'.
1) Brittany is not a toddler who needs a grown-up to tell her what she's doing wrong. She's not Elmo: not as endearing and not as innocent.
2) Just because she's supposed to be dumb, or a genius (who knows at this point), doesn't mean that Brittanny can abuse other people at will, like using them as chess pieces.
Oh well, maybe I'm reading that scene wrong and it just rubs me the wrong way, but one way or another they'll scew it up, I'm sure.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh joy, just what I was hoping for.
Not happy about it. Oh well, I won't be watching at least live. I for sure won't be watch any episodes when Blaine get's to NY along with Sam.
ChrisColferFan1- Bruce
- Posts : 2848
Join date : 2012-04-24
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Still trying to figure out what they would use human chess pieces as far as Santana and Britany in a McKinley courtyard. Musical number?
It doesn't look as of now if either Dot or Jayma are going to be used for "100" which kinda of sucks considering their history on the show. Or am I wrong, has Jayma been in the building?
It doesn't look as of now if either Dot or Jayma are going to be used for "100" which kinda of sucks considering their history on the show. Or am I wrong, has Jayma been in the building?
Buenos- Inner Grandma
- Posts : 6331
Join date : 2012-04-20
Location : California
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Glorfindel wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh joy, just what I was hoping for.
Hey, look on the bright side. It will probably include a nice platonic hug.
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Jellyrolls wrote:Glorfindel wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh joy, just what I was hoping for.
Hey, look on the bright side. It will probably include a nice platonic hug.
That I can handle at least somewhat . What I can not handle. Is Blaine singing while Kurt sits on a stool. Or a scene in which Kurt praises Blaine as can do no wrong. Or something similar.
ChrisColferFan1- Bruce
- Posts : 2848
Join date : 2012-04-24
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
ChrisColferFan1 wrote:
That I can handle. What I can not handle. Is Blaine singing while Kurt sits on a stool. Or a scene in which Kurt praises Blaine as can do no wrong. Or something similar.
Well, unfortunately, you know all of this will happen. Maybe with a side of Blaine cheating, too.
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Jellyrolls wrote:ChrisColferFan1 wrote:
That I can handle. What I can not handle. Is Blaine singing while Kurt sits on a stool. Or a scene in which Kurt praises Blaine as can do no wrong. Or something similar.
Well, unfortunately, you know all of this will happen. Maybe with a side of Blaine cheating, too.
True, which is a big reason I won't be watching at all once Blaine get's to NY. I am almost positive if Adam and Adam Apples were still around on scene ,and Kurt was still part of the group, he would be kicked out and they would let Blaine take his place. Maybe they would have changed the group name from Adam Apples to Blaine And The Bananas ,or something similar.
ChrisColferFan1- Bruce
- Posts : 2848
Join date : 2012-04-24
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
I spy someone lurking behind Chord's monstrous forehead.sheny wrote:
Porcelain- Baby Penguin
- Posts : 64
Join date : 2014-01-15
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
Again, have to search past the mediocrity for the worthwhile portion hiding in the back.
Porcelain- Baby Penguin
- Posts : 64
Join date : 2014-01-15
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
NGL,
I love seeing photos BHS of the old cast on set..... Dianna and Heather look so pretty...
Melissa is in Sundance promoting a movie of hers, of all the Noobs she is the one who I 've no doubt will get more opportunities, she's building a solid resume on shows now and I admit she is exceptionally pretty. The problem was her character had no edge on Glee.
I love seeing photos BHS of the old cast on set..... Dianna and Heather look so pretty...
Melissa is in Sundance promoting a movie of hers, of all the Noobs she is the one who I 've no doubt will get more opportunities, she's building a solid resume on shows now and I admit she is exceptionally pretty. The problem was her character had no edge on Glee.
Buenos- Inner Grandma
- Posts : 6331
Join date : 2012-04-20
Location : California
Re: Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 20
LOL, part 3
Porcelain- Baby Penguin
- Posts : 64
Join date : 2014-01-15
Page 1 of 40 • 1, 2, 3 ... 20 ... 40
Similar topics
» Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread--part 1
» Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 19
» Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 10
» Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread--part 2
» Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 16
» Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 19
» Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 10
» Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread--part 2
» Kurt Hummel Spoiler Thread - part 16
Page 1 of 40
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|