Gossip World

anonymous asked:

What do you make of Ryan Murphy's comments regarding Lea/Naya and Naya being back for the final season? Just warped PR or do you think they resolved issues and 'unfired' her? I noticed he was very careful to say everyone was invited back and didn't say to what extent or how

mjsbigblog: Who knows.

If Naya changed her mind about leaving Glee, and apologized profusely for blowing up and getting into Brad Falchuk’s face, I could see them taking her back. Cause they need her. And I would not be surprised if Naya came to the conclusion that she needed them as well.

BTW, I learned that while Naya did have an argument with Lea that night, it definitely wasn’t Lea that got her fired. It was Naya getting in Brad’s face that got her written out of the rest of the season.

@mjs is a reliable source.

Both Ryan and Brad have started to sound like indulged white middleaged men, who've become lazy and complacent. I really wish someone, anyone would really flock them because of Glee to bring them back to earth. Because previous work has shown that they can be good at what they do, if they focus and they should just start from the beginning.

But it would get any actor in trouble if they yell or even snark at their boss. Always a bad idea.

if will get any employee into trouble if they yell at their bosses. that's a fact.   

there won't be a season 6. i am sure of it. at most there will be a 2 hour tv-movie. they have a better than to let people watch one single movie/episode w/ a self-contained story than a whole series. even that's a stretch though. the only thing is we don't know how much the pay out would be if fox wants to cancel the whole thing. i think eventually it comes down to the math. math is everything.

Lea dating a gigolo according to TMZ?

http://www.tmz.com/2014/06/11/lea-michele-new-boyfriend-former-gigolo-matthew-paetz/

Go get some girl !!    

Buenos wrote:Lea dating a gigolo according to TMZ?

http://www.tmz.com/2014/06/11/lea-michele-new-boyfriend-former-gigolo-matthew-paetz/

Go get some girl !!    

haha I couldn't avoid to think in Brody, so once again is life imitating fiction?

brisallie wrote:

Buenos wrote:Lea dating a gigolo according to TMZ?

http://www.tmz.com/2014/06/11/lea-michele-new-boyfriend-former-gigolo-matthew-paetz/

Go get some girl !!    

haha I couldn't avoid to think in Brody, so once again is life imitating fiction?

Brisallie, you couldn't write this fiction...  

Listen I don't know nor I pretend to know all the facts or if this is true, but just the thoughts of any of this ...i tell ya...!

Lea is entitled to date whoever she wants, and she certainly doesn't need my (or anyone else's) approval. I hardly think that this is a serious relationship at this point and it's hardly a surprise that she would start moving on with her life. Losing Cory was tragic, but they weren't married or even engaged (despite all the rumors that marriage was imminent) so starting to date after a year? Well within the bounds of propriety.

Not being a huge Lea stan I can be a bit more pragmatic and not get bogged down in the whole "he's not worthy of her" bullshit. I may not think that dating a former escort is the best idea for a young rising female star, but again, it's not my business. Do have to say that the parallels between Lea and Rachel grow even tighter considering that Rachel's first post-Finn relationship was Brody, who was working as an escort. Now Lea herself is dating a former escort as her first post-Cory relationship (that we know about). I just find that interesting.

I think the news here is not the fact she's dating again, it was something that was gonna happen at some point, she's free to restart her romantic life again. But the fact she's dating an ex escort, umm yeah I don't know how this will affect her image; but is not our business, she's the one who know the person she's dating.

But still I want to ask you Buenos, how Lea's fans are taking this? Are they happy or don't like the past of this guy?

The response that I've seen so far has been... interesting. There's no clear consenses. Some fans are pleased that Lea is moving on with her life and are supportive. Some are happy that she's moving on, but not happy that she picked someone with a past like this to do it with. And some are really resentful that she is besmirching Cory's memory by dating someone else.

I personally have no issue at all with Lea moving on at this stage (as I said before - nearly a year is more than long enough considering that they weren't engaged or married). I think that her choice in a new boyfriend is... let's just say it doesn't show great taste or judgement given that she would have to be aware that there would be a lot of interest in who she would be dating. But this is Lea's business. It's her public reputation and being that I'm not a huge Lea stan, I don't have any kind of investment in her personal life. Hopefully this guy is a good one (despite his other work) and he treats Lea well and makes her happy.

Ranwing wrote:The response that I've seen so far has been... interesting. There's no clear consenses. Some fans are pleased that Lea is moving on with her life and are supportive. Some are happy that she's moving on, but not happy that she picked someone with a past like this to do it with. And some are really resentful that she is besmirching Cory's memory by dating someone else.

I personally have no issue at all with Lea moving on at this stage (as I said before - nearly a year is more than long enough considering that they weren't engaged or married). I think that her choice in a new boyfriend is... let's just say it doesn't show great taste or judgement given that she would have to be aware that there would be a lot of interest in who she would be dating. But this is Lea's business. It's her public reputation and being that I'm not a huge Lea stan, I don't have any kind of investment in her personal life. Hopefully this guy is a good one (despite his other work) and he treats Lea well and makes her happy.

you perfectly wrote my opinion on the matter. while i frown at the "ex escort" bit, she should move on if she is ready and if this is the guy she likes, go for it girl. if nothing else, i'm sure he is "great listener" and probably good in bed. if he is a decent enough guy, what more would a girl want.

also, it's OT but :

FIFA WORLD CUP HAS BEGAN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

granted, she is getting all these premium services for free. girl is smart!  

brisallie wrote:I think the news here is not the fact she's dating again, it was something that was gonna happen at some point, she's free to restart her romantic life again. But the fact she's dating an ex escort, umm yeah I don't know how this will affect her image; but is not our business, she's the one who know the person she's dating.

But still I want to ask you Buenos, how Lea's fans are taking this? Are they happy or don't like the past of this guy?

I think it's more we don't know all the facts and even then, if she dates again she's entitled to make her choices.  If he treats her right I'm not going to judge her as long as she's happy.

What is hilarious is that if she was as PR driven as her detractors claim, she wouldn't have dated him, but even if she didn't know, it's her life. She should date if she wants to.

Gwyneth Paltrow and Brad Falchuk are 'officialy' dating now: link.
There have stubborn been rumours of them already being very close on the set of Glee some time ago.

So more Holly Holiday to waste precious screentime look forward to in season 6?  

The comments there are quite harsh about both of them.

It would be just like RIB to bring back Gwyneth, so I guess we'll look forward to more Holly Holiday. New love interest for Sam perhaps?

Makes you wonder what else happens behind the scenes to dictate screen time . I always thought Glee had a strange obsession with Heidi Holliday, giving the character so much spotlight in the "100" celebration last year struck me as just odd.

I didn't mind Holly much in season two, but the character was kind of ridiculous and unnecessary after that.

glee is RIB's pet project. they can put whoever they want in there. 

i don't care about "precious" screen time anymore. our Precious never gets much no matter how few characters are in the episode. so he had one solo last year? i don't expect even one in season 6. i am looking forward to outside projects such as Noel to hear chris singing.

Don't know if anyone heard the news yet, but a hacker is releasing nude photos of a lot of female celebrities, including Lea Michele, Melissa Benoist and Becca Tobin from Glee.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/rachelzarrell/jennifer-lawrence-ariana-grande-picture-leak?

First of all: what an enormous asshole.  
Second: why only female celebrities? I'm sure there will be enough out there to hack that male celebrities have taken pictures of. Is this another double standard thing of shaming women with their bodies and sexualities? Or did the hacker assume (probably rightfully, sadly) that the media wouldn't be that interested in male nudes and male celebrities being exposed?

This also makes me think about Chris' accounts being hacked a while back, and how KevinMcHale said how serious it was. And then the next day Lea's twitter also (allegedly, still not sure about that) got hacked. What if it's the same guy? What if it was part of this operation?

Hopefully Chris is wise enough to keep any 'compromising' private pics he perhaps might have taken far away from his more public accounts (and still some personal pics of him and Will were stolen from private accounts), but I assume that's also what some of those female celebrities who are being 'exposed' now did, with some of them e.g. saying they deleted the private pics years ago. It's too simply to say "just don't take nude pictures ever".
Bottomline is that hackers are attention seeking creepy douchebags, and unfortunately celebrities are more vulnerable to being targeted by them.

Btw: you gotta love Becca Tobin's reaction tweet to the news though:

^ great tweet!

now about the hacking releasing only nude female pics - i don't think it has anything to do w/ shaming the women. instead, the hacker is likely a young straight male who is only interested in nude females. in fact, most hackers tend to be young male, mostly likely straight (simply because there are a lot more straight people than gay ones in the population). 

the hack is likely due to a flaw in apple's icloud system. that means you should never ever put your sensitive stuff in the cloud. they always tell you that it's extremely safe, but nothing is guaranteed. unfortunately the trend is to move everything into the "cloud", so things like this can be expected to happen pretty routinely in the future.

Of course I[m not justifying the hackers....

but...

Don't take naked pictures of yourself if you don't want them to resurface eventually, just saying.

^That's trying to limit/police people's (and especially women's) sexual freedom, saying they shouldn't do sexual (and/or own body loving) stuff like taking nudes because that could be viewed as shameful or jerking off material to others, even if whatever they do in the privacy of their homes/bedrooms gets exposed only because someone else violated said privacy and did something against the law.
Everyone has the right to do anything in the privacy of their home as long as they're not hurting others in the process, and their privacy includes whatever they store away in their private data space.

Also there's no saying these pics would have been safe if they only were saved on e.g. an external hard drive or memory stick, as these can get stolen too. That still doesn't mean people should refrain from taking them, or that other people have the right to take them without asking and then make them public.

It reeks a bit of victim blaming, tbh, even slut shaming.

People should just stay the hell away from other people's private stuff. It's downright stealing, plain and simple. It's not those people's fault that there was a leak in a cloud from a big name provider.
As someone on tumblr said (ironically) : "The lock on your diary wasn’t very good, so it’s your fault I read your diary."

many actors are among the most beautiful/attractive people on this planet, and they spend a lot of time grooming, maintaining and appreciation their looks. it's only natural. there's nothing wrong w/ taking nude pics of yourself for private enjoyment. the problem is not the picture taking part. it's what you do w/ those pictures afterwards. since most people use cell phone to take selfies (that means you don't need another person to be present and seeing you naked), and many cellphones and/or cell companies offer to store photos in the cloud instantly and automatically. i know a lot of people taking advantage of that convenience. Cloud storage is a great concept because you can access it from anywhere, using any device, any time. It's virtually impossible to lose them (we assume those giant data centers have multiple backups to keep them safe), as long as you trust the companies that offer the cloud service. people have a lot of trust in Apple, more so than any other companies. Apple has loyal followers who make B/Klaine stans look sedated. 

I continue to use cloud service to storage my music, video, books and work related stuff online. I will not put sensitive stuff there just in case.

so if you can't resist taking nude photos of yourself, take them, enjoy them on local media only, and keep them encrypted w/ a strong password.

As awful as this situation was, also I believe people doesn't have to be forbidden to take nude pictures, as it would seems you are shameful of your body; if their feel comfortable in their own skin, fine. So for me the problem here is, each person has to decide what pics upload or not and not someone else. And this include boyfriends's girls too, not matter how much you trust that person, but you never know what gonna happen later, what if they breakup isn't in nice terms, what if he has revengul feelings?

As for the hacker, so far don't know well how is going the investigation, but hopefully that person is caught soon.

if cave women had cellphones, they would all have taken nude selfies. 

Of course people can take nudie pictures of themselves.  I"m just saying that things like Icloud can be and was obviously hacked, so just be aware that there are risks of putting something out there where others can have access to it.

It's more a common sense thang...